• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Now that can be an issue for some people (I mean secret contracts and stuff like that). I don’t use an image editor but if I did, I’d use Krita btw

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      191 month ago

      Krita, Inkspace, Gimp. I understand those who use it professionally but not the zealots who dont/barely use it yet demand for it like their life depended on it.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 month ago

        If you’re using it professionally, you need your Photoshop to be properly licensed.

        If you’re not using it professionally, there’s no need for proper licenses. And thus you can…acquire Photoshop in a way that doesn’t involve it calling back to Adobe’s systems.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          329 days ago

          I mean, sure… But a whole lot of people use Photoshop professionally without a license.

          Krita is great, though. Their Android version is even fully featured, so you can use a tablet with a digitizer if you don’t have a drawing pad for your desktop.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            429 days ago

            Photoshop does a lot of things in really stupid, convoluted ways. Krita also does a lot of the same things in equally stupid, convoluted ways, but different than PS so you get no benefit from knowing how its done in other software. Text editing comes to mind. Both PS and Krita feel like they were designed by drunk people when it comes to doing anything beyond writing text and picking a font/color/size.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              429 days ago

              IIRC the Krita people were working on redoing the text tool. Not sure if/when it’s going to be finished, though.