• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3125 days ago

    The weird thing is that in this scenario these panels are still applicable for replacement probably because the the solar panels of today compared to then are about ~40% more efficient. So compared to a new replacement it’s at around 60% efficiency. A major site plans profit off of 30 years and plans to replace glass at that time, so while it may still be somewhat useful long term it’s probably more profitable to replace them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4125 days ago

      … And since they’re still good they can be resold and used by others where efficiency isn’t the main concern, no need to trash them

      • K0W4L5K1
        link
        fedilink
        English
        724 days ago

        I want to add they aren’t even that inefficient for 20 year old tech thats impressive

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2125 days ago

      I wonder if this type of economic calculus would mean a supply of inexpensive, second-hand panels might be available in the next few years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        They already are, at least for the smaller ones. You can go to your citie’s parks and recreation department to get some. All those solar panels that power various signs and lights have been collected and replaced for years. I picked up a few years ago in Lexington, KY, for next to nothing, and they worked just fine for the lights that I wanted to power, despite only outputting less than 50% of their original power.

        Not sure where you would find the full size ones like these pictured.