• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    open source wasn’t really a thing in the 90s and early 2000s

    Truly written as someone who wasn’t alive back then and just makes stuff up.

    Open-source - which was called free software back then - was very much alive and totally a thing since forever, and especially in the 70s, 80s and 90s. I learned all I know with free software in the 80s. Linux came out in 91 and was a pure product of open source: Minix - the forerunner of Linux - was a fully open-source OS created in 87, and GNU had been around since 83.

    Please read up on things you don’t know before posting nonsense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      526 days ago

      I’ve been an internet user since 1994, and I can tell you this. Unnecessary hostility like this has always a thing from the very beginning. Even if the OP made a mistake, not saying that he did, why be a dick about it? Just add to the information pile.

      That’s my PSA.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        826 days ago

        And boomer is telling you it was mainstream. Very much so. The only reason it wasn’t as developed as it is today is because computing wasn’t as developed as it is today.

      • @realbadat
        link
        English
        326 days ago

        Canonical was the early 2000s. Redhat was the early 90s. Inspire was the early 2000s. Collabara was mid-2000s. Ximiam was late 90s.

        Not only was open source pretty popular, it had a not-insignificant group of companies working on it.

        He’s very much correct.

          • @realbadat
            link
            English
            326 days ago

            Wow, you are not only unable to accept that you’re wrong, you make references to exactly what others have talked about, and then you act like a dick about it.

            Your comments apparently add nothing of value, so… Goodbye.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              326 days ago

              Yet another example of unnecessary hostility? Just disagree, for God’s sake. I’m not really sure what the actual argument is about, just chill.

              • @realbadat
                link
                English
                226 days ago

                Nah, try reading through his messages in order. He gets nasty right away, as he did to another who pointed out his mistake. I figured I’d provide some supporting context, he again behaved like a dick. So I blocked him.

                Doesn’t seem problematic to me at all.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  426 days ago

                  It seemed to go pearshape right from the very beginning.

                  I just get tired from angry posts all the fricken time. People have opinions you don’t agree with. People get stuff wrong sometimes. I posted something wrong by mistake yesterday and someone corrected me and I withdrew it. No biggie.

                  Block, don’t block, I don’t care. People should just relax a bit. Hulking out over the most ridiculous points is insane and not good for one’s mental health.

                  • @realbadat
                    link
                    English
                    226 days ago

                    “Hulking out”?

                    He made a mistake assumption, I provided info, he responded with nastiness, I blocked. I really don’t see what you’re hung up on here.