• wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Microsoft has tons of open source stuff and tons of support programs for open source projects.

    There are plenty of reasons to criticize Microsoft, but FOSS isn’t one of them.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah, now, and only because they lost and gave up. Some of us don’t forgive past misdeeds so easily.

      Besides, even to this day, most (if not all) of their “support” for open source is about getting it to play more nicely with Windows or trying to prevent people who insist on using open source from jumping ship to Linux, not supporting it for its own sake.

      I’ll believe Microsoft actually supports open source when they start porting things like Office or Flight Simulator to Linux, not before.

      • Yeah but I think that this highlights something quite well: Open Source is inherently corporate. It was created as a branch from the free/libre software movement, to extract it’s open development model and make it corporate-friendly

        “Open Source is just a corporate development model”

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Are they, though? How many game studios did they just buy and immediately shutter? Have they ever NOT been involved in anti-competitive lawsuits?

              • msage
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                How about the Office format shenanigans?

                Do people not know or forget that M$ is only supporting things that don’t threaten their bottom line, or things they themselves (ab)use?