@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agoRaspberry Pi becomes a public companywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up1696arrow-down111
arrow-up1685arrow-down1external-linkRaspberry Pi becomes a public companywww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square170fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoThat is due to power reasons ,but they could have just underclocked it by default.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•4 months agoI don’t buy it. USBC can deliver quite a lot of power
minus-squareDacoTacolinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoI agree. Pi5 apparently uses 5v@5A max, which is outside the usbc-pd specs. Not sure why they didnt go for usbc-9v in and use onboard components to convert the power to something lower for cpu ( which i assume it already does from 5v )
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months agoMaybe those packages are bulky or something.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoWait is it locked to the official charger?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoI dunno maybe cpu? Really it is actually stupid why didn’t they just make it optional.
minus-squareDacoTacolinkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months agoTbh, i cant make an opinion without technical details :')
That is due to power reasons ,but they could have just underclocked it by default.
I don’t buy it. USBC can deliver quite a lot of power
I agree. Pi5 apparently uses 5v@5A max, which is outside the usbc-pd specs. Not sure why they didnt go for usbc-9v in and use onboard components to convert the power to something lower for cpu ( which i assume it already does from 5v )
Maybe those packages are bulky or something.
Wait is it locked to the official charger?
What is the power reason if i may ask?
I dunno maybe cpu? Really it is actually stupid why didn’t they just make it optional.
Tbh, i cant make an opinion without technical details :')