• @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1016 days ago

    You realize it’s trivial to isolate and monitor traffic for a device on your network, right? Like this isn’t magic, we have the tools to check whether or not it’s physically possible for these devices to be exfiltrating 24h of audio a day based on the bandwidth they consume, and the variability in the transmitted data. There are free, fully sufficient tools to do this at literally every level of your home network, if these devices were actually recording all the time people would be noticing it and reporting on it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -616 days ago

      they can encrypt the data and bundle it with other requests. regardless, is it really easier to 24/7 monitor your web traffic than to just use a computer/phone instead of a voice assistant ?

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1216 days ago

        Encrypted doesn’t mean magically violating the laws of physics, data uses bandwidth. There’s no reason for these devices to be using the amount of bandwidth it would take to make what you’re implying even close to feasible.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            216 days ago

            Yes because security researchers and hobbyists would never compare an isolated device to one plugged in next to a TV or in a crowded room, there just isn’t any data to support that anything like that is happening. As many other commenters have said, these devices are less complex than a cell phone and most people have no issues carrying one of those around. If one of your devices was “tapped” it would be that one.

          • @Hexarei
            link
            English
            116 days ago

            Most text transcript services are too complex to run on the tiny little processor in these devices. They would be sending audio or nothing at all