@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 days agoEvidencemander.xyzimagemessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down126
arrow-up1374arrow-down1imageEvidencemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 days agomessage-square84fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-2•7 days agoBut that doesn’t make your claim provable
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•7 days agoA claim doesn’t need evidence to the contrary to be disputed, so no thats not what you said
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•7 days agoI said it wasn’t proof, but that it was evidence. You can dispute a claim that has evidence but if you don’t have any evidence yourself you’re going to look like an idiot who ignores the most likely truth and instead clings to their faith.
But that doesn’t make your claim provable
I literally said that.
A claim doesn’t need evidence to the contrary to be disputed, so no thats not what you said
I said it wasn’t proof, but that it was evidence. You can dispute a claim that has evidence but if you don’t have any evidence yourself you’re going to look like an idiot who ignores the most likely truth and instead clings to their faith.