@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoEvidencemander.xyzimagemessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1405arrow-down126
arrow-up1379arrow-down1imageEvidencemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square84fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoMaybe there were other big bangs, but we need evidence of that, and that evidence doesn’t exist. Jyst saying “but we don’t know” isn’t a replacement for evidence.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•3 months agoThere’s no evidence that time started at the big bang, either. So it’s silly to say.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoNot how it works. “Time exists” is a positive statement. We need evidence for positive statements. There is no evidence of time until the big bang.
Maybe there were other big bangs, but we need evidence of that, and that evidence doesn’t exist.
Jyst saying “but we don’t know” isn’t a replacement for evidence.
There’s no evidence that time started at the big bang, either. So it’s silly to say.
Not how it works.
“Time exists” is a positive statement. We need evidence for positive statements. There is no evidence of time until the big bang.