@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 3 months agoThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1external-linkThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.com@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square159fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink50•3 months agoDefine bribe and you’ll start to see where enforcing this becomes a problem. Especially with legalized corruption in the form of lobbying and ‘gifts’.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink43•3 months agoWell, federal officials are already forbidden from accepting gifts/anything valued more than $25 in one instance, and no more than $100 a year from any one group or person. Enforcing that seems like a good place to start.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoBillionaires can just make a coupon thousand shell orgs to funnel $100ks into their pockets.
Define bribe and you’ll start to see where enforcing this becomes a problem. Especially with legalized corruption in the form of lobbying and ‘gifts’.
Well, federal officials are already forbidden from accepting gifts/anything valued more than $25 in one instance, and no more than $100 a year from any one group or person. Enforcing that seems like a good place to start.
Billionaires can just make a coupon thousand shell orgs to funnel $100ks into their pockets.