@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 3 days agoThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1external-linkThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.com@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 3 days agomessage-square159fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@Zinklink8•3 days agoAt this point it’s pretty easy to imagine a governor or president giving the SC the finger and doing what they want. Unfortunately when I see that play out in my mind, it’s a Republican doing it. Yes, even though the SC is biased in their direction.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•3 days agoI believe this happened, and is still happening in regards to Texas ignoring the SC ruling about letting federal Border Patrol agents access to certain parts of the border.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•3 days agoGreg Abbott would certainly ignore any decision he didn’t agree with.
At this point it’s pretty easy to imagine a governor or president giving the SC the finger and doing what they want.
Unfortunately when I see that play out in my mind, it’s a Republican doing it. Yes, even though the SC is biased in their direction.
I believe this happened, and is still happening in regards to Texas ignoring the SC ruling about letting federal Border Patrol agents access to certain parts of the border.
Greg Abbott would certainly ignore any decision he didn’t agree with.