@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoI just cited myself.mander.xyzimagemessage-square231fedilinkarrow-up1844arrow-down143
arrow-up1801arrow-down1imageI just cited myself.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square231fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-23 months agoThat’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing. 3/3 = 0.99999… 3/3 = 1 If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-23 months agoNah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof
That’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing.
3/3 = 0.99999…
3/3 = 1
If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
Nah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof