• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -13
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I don’t even know the lyrics to some of my favorite songs. I think the whole complaining about unlimited, free lyrics is ridiculous. Spotify isn’t a charity and just because someone can’t enjoy music as much due to not reading lyrics isn’t an accessibility thing.

    Guess Spotify should just get rid of the free tier and then this wouldn’t even be an issue.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 days ago

      Okay, well get back to me when you have some lived experience of deafness and maybe we can have a productive discussion then, seeing as my point seems to have gone completely over your head.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 days ago

          If this were doable…

          .

          .

          Shouldn’t they, though?

          Like, here’s your 5 stacks of normal newspapers, here’s your 1 stack of braille newspapers. Take your pick.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 days ago

          Listen, I don’t want to be in a pointless internet argument; I could answer your question by referencing some of the things that go into deciding what reasonable adjustments should be put in place, legally speaking (in particular, your question is getting at the “how much is reasonable” aspect of the problem"), but I only want to engage in this conversation if you’re actually interested to learn.

          (On that front, I apologise for the sharp tone of my previous comment, because that certainly wasn’t conducive to conversation.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Legally speaking, the ADA promotes accessibility in public accommodations, but it does not require music streaming services to provide lyrics. There is no legal precedent requiring these services.

            Additionally, the service in question is free. Do any music streaming services provide both lyrics and music for free? While I don’t particularly favor Spotify, this argument doesn’t relate to any legal obligation on their part.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              54 days ago

              There is no legal precedent requiring these services.

              There is legal precedent for requiring captioning where I’m from and probably in the US as well. Practically every form of broadcasted video (and at least here, it is required of websites with video) has a legal requirement to provide captions. I don’t see how it would be difficult to apply that to music.

              It being available on the free tier has almost no relevance to Spotify being a profit making entity that has to comply with the law. I’d be surprised if they don’t get in trouble for it legally. As pointed out elsewhere it’s paywalling an accessibility feature. Which seems like a great way to draw enough eyeballs to your bullshit and get legislation changes; assuming it doesn’t already violate it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                43 days ago

                Yes in the USA there are laws that require CC on programs being televised, but not all. Interestingly enough, one of the TV exemptions is programs that are mostly musical.

                After doing a bit of research now I can see your point and I agree with you that this could set up a legal situation like it did back in the 90s. I wouldn’t mind if they revisited the 1996 Telecommunications Act so they could break up the radio monopoly here, but I digress.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  03 days ago

                  one of the TV exemptions is programs that are mostly musical.

                  Even being hearing impaired, I gotta be honest, the irony is kinda funny. Glad to hear it! I was concerned that people in this thread advocating for it would seem like they’re coming from a place of entitlement so I hoped bringing the caption side of it would highlight otherwise. I agree! Hopefully they do at some point but slow progress for stuff like that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                I’ve never seen closed captioning for music in shows, it’s literally just music signs. So obviously they aren’t the same and you’re talking out of your ass like the other user……

                So what precedent? Your precedent that you are claiming, shows that it’s okay to not CC music lyrics…. Jeeez shot your own fucking foot with this silly pout didn’t you…?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 days ago

                  Jeeez shot your own fucking foot with this silly pout didn’t you…?

                  Honestly, this caught me so off guard it made me laugh. Not even the guy I was disagreeing with came at like that?? The point was caption/transcription/lyrics are essentially synonymous, all are transcribing some other medium to text for the point of being read. So my point that there is precedent (CC on television being required legally) still stands.

                  It does shit me that older programs they could/can just put the treble clef symbol for music as you mentioned though.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    It does shit me that older programs they could/can just put the treble clef symbol for music as you mentioned though.

                    Old…? That’s the point dude, they still do it since there is no requirement (even in fucking tv) to cc music. Wow…. Music has NEVER EVER FUCKING BEEN CLOSED CAPTIONED.

                    Lmfao.

                    There is zero precedent and your point is just wrong, your example they don’t even CC the music in it… so how is it precedent for it on radio. Fucking yeesh. Your example actually proves there is absolutely zero precedent on anything for music closed captioning…. Hence shooting your fucking foot with your own point… can you comprehend that now? Or does it need to be explained even more simply for you……?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      Spotify isn’t a charity

      Ohh, they’re trying to be a shit-hole. Now I understand.

      You guys, there’s a reason we don’t clean toilets. Toilets are supposed to be dirty.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 days ago

          I’m just agreeing that Spotify isn’t a charity. They have no obligation to be good or useful, and they will continue to destroy their service, and things will continue to get worse, and there’s no point in fighting any of this, and there never will be, and so it is, and so it shall be, until you die.

          It’s just, I’m learning in real time now how best to treat life, you know? It’s good stuff.