What the Supreme Court Chevron decision means for environmental rules
wapo.st
The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine could prevent federal agencies from issuing ambitious climate and wildlife rules, lawyers say.
  • tastysnacks
    4·
    7 个月前

    It doesn’t even need to be ambitious. It just has to be ambiguous.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      21·
      7 个月前

      But what does “has to” mean anyways? The reality is motivated judge can rule pretty much anything as “ambiguous”