• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      You’re moving the goalposts though, you realize that right?

      Your initial position was that you have to have exploited people to be worth a billion dollars (with an implicit “directly exploited,” since if you can’t make any money without indirectly exploiting people, which would make your point even more pedantic than I’m being.)

      Other people later exploiting others to profit off your product is irrelevant. Hell, it’d be irrelevant if you made your billion dollars and then started exploiting people yourself. You still would have, in fact, become a billionaire without exploiting people to do so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          Sure, but if that’s the argument, then everyone who has ever bought a laptop that shipped with Windows on it is equally guilty.

          Perhaps even moreso. Those people are giving money to Microsoft. He took a billion dollars away from them.

          But like, this is classic motte and baily. Your initial position was “all billionaires exploit labor for profit,” but when under scrutiny you just retreat to “there is no ethical consumption under capitalism, so he’s guilty by virtue of simply participating in the system.”

          • @msage
            link
            23 months ago

            Oh I would classify everyone who gives M$ money as guilty.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Wow you want to regulate private business? Sounds pretty woke /s

          Read this idiots post history everyone