It’s become clear to many that Red Hat’s recent missteps with CentOS and the availability of RHEL source code indicate that it’s fallen from its respected place as “the open organization.” SUSE seems to be poised to benefit from Red Hat’s errors. We connect the dots.

  • @[email protected]
    22•2 months ago

    To be honest, their demand that OpenSUSE rebrand left a bad taste in my mouth. I get the logic behind it, but the time for that passed a long time ago (probably about 15 years ago).

    • @[email protected]English
      7•2 months ago

      their demand that OpenSUSE rebrand

      Slight changing of the tone, there. They have formally requested the change, not demanded.

      Maybe that will follow, I can’t read the future, but it’s not the case today.

      • @[email protected]
        4•2 months ago

        I mean yes they did “formally request” it, but given the power dynamic between a FOSS project and a large technology company, openSUSE is not in a position where they could possibly refuse. So is there a difference between a request and a demand?

          • @LeFantome
            2•2 months ago

            I am sure it is a requirement really. Who owns the SUSE trademark?