• MartianFox
      link
      fedilink
      492 months ago

      Sounds a bit like its a bad idea to install CrowdStrike regardless of the system 🙃

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      To those many Linux users who took a look at their circumstances and said “I definitely need antivirus software!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        CrowdStrike does more than anti-virus and yes enterprise Linux installations need a lot of security controls that average Linux users don’t need.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            212 months ago

            Bruh, I’ve used Linux for over 10 years. I run Arch on my laptop and have a homelab powered by Proxmox, Debian, and OPNSense. I don’t run any AV in my lab but do follow other security practices.

            At work it’s a different story. Products like CrowdStrike also collect logs, scan for vulnerabilities, provide graphing and dashboarding capabilities, provide integrations into ticketing platforms for investigation and remediation by security teams, and more. AV is often required because Windows users can upload infected files to Linux-run SMB shares. Products like CrowdStrike often satisfy requirements set by cybersecurity insurance.

            This is not simping, this is not Linux vs Windows. You just clearly have no experience in the enterprise Linux space and business security requirements.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -17
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I don’t need to argue about windows vs Linux. You’re overcomplicating and misinterpreting my point and it’s no longer worth it to me because you clearly are prioritizing defense

              Edit: let’s see if we can get to 100 downvotes here. I mean this shit is just so offensive right?