@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agoGood pointlemmy.worldimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1614arrow-down126
arrow-up1588arrow-down1imageGood pointlemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoI’ve only had this phrase explained to me recently, and since then I can’t help but think it would make more sense if it was told the other way around; such as “you can’t eat your cake and have it too”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoOr if it had originally been rendered as, “you can’t keep your cake and eat it, too!”
I’ve only had this phrase explained to me recently, and since then I can’t help but think it would make more sense if it was told the other way around; such as “you can’t eat your cake and have it too”.
Or if it had originally been rendered as, “you can’t keep your cake and eat it, too!”
Six in one half dozen in the other