• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No one’s pushing anybody to do anything. The dead game discourse is about keeping art alive and preserving a freedom to choose what to play.

    Edit: Wow. Weird way to phrase things. A “dead” game is something you’ll never be aple to play again (like The Crew). This guy is talking about “abandoned” games.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      212 months ago

      “Dead game” in this context refers to games that have low active player count. The obsession with active player count and daily player count is countered by things like daily log-in rewards that turn games into jobs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve seen it in the article. But there’s currently a campaign going on that’s concerned with truly dead games. Calling a game which had a drop in player count “dead” is IMHO counterproductive, since it muddles the water for the current campaign.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          “dead game” isnt owned by that movement and it has nothing to do with the article. “oh my bad” would have sufficed, blaming the article for your misinterpretation of the headline is silly

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            The campaign is called “stop killing games”.

            And palworld isn’t dead. Youecan still play it.

    • Gamma
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      People have been calling low player count games “dead games” faaaaaar longer than Ross’s campaign as been around. It’s so common it has a know your meme page! Your use is in the top description, but the origin and more popular use of the term is definitely referring to player counts