• @parpol
    link
    English
    571 month ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 month ago

      Chromium (Google Chrome’s base) is also open source.

      And yet, we’re still at a corporation’s mercy as to whether everything Chromium-based gets ruined by Google’s fuck-what-the-users-want policies. Like with Manifest V3. And JXL support. And extensions on mobile.

      • @parpol
        link
        English
        91 month ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 month ago

          Except now you have to maintain a branch that’s missing everything after that release upstream.

          • @parpol
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            deleted by creator

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Yeah you can probably do periodic merge or rebase etc. But then you have the fun of merge conflicts

      • John Richard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -431 month ago

        Users do want MV3. The people complaining about it are in the minority.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          471 month ago

          Users don’t know what the fuck Manifest is period. They just click the internet button. And for the longest time that meant the E with a loop around it. Now that means the multicolored circle.

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -241 month ago

            Users know that they want more security. MV3 makes a major of users that use Chrome safer from malicious extensions.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              301 month ago

              I get what you’re saying, but the average person has no idea what it is, why they should care, or anything about it. All they see is Google making their extensions stop working. And when that includes some of the most popular extensions, that directly affect Googles revenue, they’re going to think that’s the reason.

              The overwhelming majority of users get their extensions from the Chrome Web Store… Which Google has full control over. Users expect them to be blocking almost all malicious extensions before they’re even available to download.

              • z3rOR0ne
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                This. Google is pushing MV3 to single out and neuter the more robust and customizable ad blockers, like uBO. They’re trying to appease their advertising investors by force feeding ads to you and they’re plugging the leaks/workarounds savvy developers have created to block them.

                If Firefox ever gets popular enough, what do you wanna bet money bags Google, their primary monetary contributor, will put a condition on the next round of funding that they stop support for MV2?

                Stay small and crazy customizable Firefox.

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -301 month ago

            Because it makes a majority of users that use Chrome much safer. Do you do any basic research? Do you need me to point you to the getting started guide?

            • The Quuuuuill
              link
              fedilink
              English
              251 month ago

              It doesn’t though. An adblocker is your VERY most important tool in a good security posture. Googles playing any users who ask for MV3 for fools

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 month ago

                The average user is and always will be an ignorant and careless user. And they are the majority. As in over 50%

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      So is Android. So is Chromium. So is React, and Flutter. So is Java.

      Open source doesn’t mean FOSS.

      • @parpol
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          No it doesn’t. Different licenses dictate what you can and can’t do with open source software. Some are more restrictive than others. Open source simply means that the source code is freely available.