• CameronDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 months ago

    Chromecast with Google TV made the “simple” casting worse for some apps like Netflix. Instead of it casting directly, it would spawn the Netflix app and make you use the remote to reselect the show you wanted to see.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also they made it reliant on the Google Home app, which makes it really hard to change WiFi networks. It’s a pain in the ass if you have multiple WiFi networks setup at your house.

      • CameronDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Remind me, what app did it use before? I have had Chromecast since gen 1, can’t remember any other app, but that’s probably my memory failing.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Honestly I don’t remember. I had a gen 1 Chromecast as well and I think it was just a Chromecast app. Now it’s all integrated with Google Home.

          Edit: I tried googling it and under the Wikipedia page description it showed the following. But what’s funny is if you go to the Wikipedia page, that text is no longer there.

          Originally called simply “Chromecast”, the app was released concurrently with the original Chromecast video model …

        • CameronDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I take my Chromecast on holiday, you basically have to factory reset it every time to change network. But my recollection is that you’ve always had to do that.

          • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            That makes perfect sense, and switching is definitely annoying then… But the person I responded to said they had multiple WiFi networks at home… E.g. Not on holiday

          • tjhart85
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            My solution: get a travel router and have it broadcast the same SSID (and use the same password) as you use at home.

            All your devices should successfully connect to it and you don’t need to factory reset them.

            Many of them have the ability to navigate through a captive portal too (since I got mine all the hotels I’ve gone to have just needed a password, so i haven’t needed to test that).

            • CameronDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I have a travel router as well, I just prefer to keep the SSIDs different. It is definitely paranoia, but if someone sees your travel router at a hotel, they know your not home, and your home can be found on wigle.net.

              Its not that bad to reset the Chromecast, and I do it infrequently, so I’m happy with that.

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have a trusted network, an IoT network (where the CC would go), and a guest network.

          I know most people aren’t going to have the time or knowledge set up network segmentation, but it’s still good practice.

            • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean, yes? I’m obviously using VLANs here. I’m not running a separate switch and AP for each network…

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I personally have a Comcast router/modem with its own network. I have a network switch that I plug into the router that I use for hard coded stuff. Mostly my PC and a couple other things that I want to run fast instead of convenient. Then I have a WiFi mesh network that I run for most of my other devices, including my phone.

          So for my Chromecast, if I want to stream from my phone on the mesh network, I have it on one network. But if I want to stream from my PC, I have it on another network. While with most devices, changing the network you’re connected to is simple, it’s a massive pain in the ass with a Chromecast.

          • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            So as far as I understand, you have

            • Outer router (Comcast), which has WiFi enabled
            • Inner router (your own), which has WiFi enabled, and further meshes with other WiFi mesh devices (or is the mesh separate?)
            • A plain switch, for stuff you want cabled and fast

            Is that correct?

            Why not get the WiFi in the Comcast router disabled, and use your inner network exclusively, such that both WiFi and ethernet devices are on the same network?

            That’s what I did with my network, and I even got the ISP to put their modem/router into bridge mode, so it’s completely transparent.

            • jballs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I could, but I like having the router network as an option to connect to. I know the point of a mesh network is to improve WiFi connectivity overall, but every once in a while it will get a bit laggy when streaming a video. Probably because I’ve got like 90 some devices connected to it. I like having the option to switch my phone to the router network and go upstream of all the other stuff.

              • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                That sound like you need a more serious setup, where you can control the network priorities and set a QoS, so the devices that you use interactively get priority over the other devices.

                • jballs@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  My mesh network actually allows me to set devices as priority. I guess I’ve never tried it out and am too lazy to go start pulling cables.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            What you need to do is put devices which you want to access from multiple networks in a specific network / VLAN and then bridge it over

    • jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah I got one of the newer ones after having a ton of the earlier models and I was disgusted by that change. Instantly returned it and bought one of the discontinued Ultras for 4K.

      • CameronDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I did the exact same thing. Its such a stupid step backwards in functionality.