Am I missing something? The article seems to suggest it works via hidden text characters. Has OpenAI never heard of pasting text into a utf8 notepad before?

  • MagicShel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Am I the only one who rewrites most of ChatGPT’s output into my own words because it’s “voice” is garbage anyway? I ask it to write me a cover letter and that gives me a rough outline and some points to make, but I have to do massive editing to avoid redundancy, awkward phrasing, outright lies, etc.

    I can’t imagine turning in raw ChatGPT output. I had one of my developers use Bing AI to write code and submitted that shit raw and it was immediately obvious because some relatively simple code has really weird artifacts like overwriting a value that had no reason to even be touched.

    • lowleveldata
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 months ago

      Idk it looks good to me. Straight to the main branch you go.

      • MagicShel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s valid. And I’d be surprised if that could be watermarked.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      For me I find it sounds too much like a marketing person or something I’d see in an ad or a website so I “dumb it down” a bit to make it not sound too corporate. Sometimes telling Chatgpt to do so fixes this though.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lol. AI gonna take over the developers job. Like that’s even close to happening.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Few years ago the output of GPT was complete gibberish and few years before that even producing such gibberish would’ve been impressive.

        It doesn’t take anyone’s job untill it does.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Few years ago the output of GPT was complete gibberish

          That’s not really true. Older GPTs were already really good. Did you ever see SubredditSimulator? I’m pretty sure that first came around like 10 years ago.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The first time I saw text written by GPT it all seemed alright at first glance but once you started to actually read it was immediately obvious it had no idea what it was talking about. It was grammatically correct nonsense.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        LLMs aren’t going to take coding jobs, there are specific case AIs being trained for that. They write code that works but does not make sense to human eyes. It’s fucking terrifying but EVERYONE just keeps focusing on the LLMS.

        There are at least 2 more dangerous model types being used right now to influence elections and manipulate online spaces and ALL everyone cares about is their fucking parrot bots…