• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 month ago

    The 2nd amendment says “a well regulated militia” and we do not have that. So maybe it’s fuck the politicians that keep our guns poorly regulated. That is what is doing more harm than good. The second amendment is designed to allow citizens to defend themselves from government tyranny not to have guns just for shits and giggles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I know, and I don’t know how the “well regulated” part got to be completely ignored? But that’s how it is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Because the second amendment is written like ass, even for back then

        A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

        Like, it’s stupidly easy to read that as “because militias are important the state can’t make laws impeding gun ownership”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Not just government tyranny, but outside threats too. When it was written, the state didn’t have the armies or infrastructure to defend the entire United States. Militias were intended to act as a national guard, should independence or the republic’s borders be encroached by outside nations. This required things to be “well-regulated” too. Who has what weapons and where should militias need to be raised to protect the free-state.

      In no way can I fathom a militia comprised of today’s Gravy SEALs and common citizens being effective, either in organisation or physical ability. Ironically, their aid would likely be a negative things for forces protecting the state. All because of poor regulation.