@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agoBook Clubi.imgur.comimagemessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down140
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1imageBook Clubi.imgur.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square131fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink25•1 month agoYou can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoLol spelling errors aren’t a great way to try and play smart
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink24•1 month agoOh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion? Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 month agoIs US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-9•1 month agoIf we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoIf we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 month agoAgreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.
Removed by mod
You can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
Removed by mod
Studied*
Lol spelling errors aren’t a great way to try and play smart
Oh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion?
Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
Removed by mod
Yes.
Is US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
Then why did you do it?
Removed by mod
Ironic. 🤣🖕🏽
If we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
If we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
Agreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.