I heard about this recently and decided to look into it. Seems neat. When I convert my existing .jpeg images to .jxl, they look identical, but take up only ~60% the space. Windows file explorer and paint dont support it however, but ImageGlass does. Considering converting all my images to .jxl to save on storage space (esp. cloud storage). Thoughts?

  • oupson
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Strangely, I enabled it a year ago and jpegxl.info is still displaying that my navigator does not support jpegxl