Unruffled [he/him]M to Lefty [email protected]English • 29 days agoFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1533arrow-down118file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1515arrow-down1imageFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostUnruffled [he/him]M to Lefty [email protected]English • 29 days agomessage-square83fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•28 days agoSo, amassing of power can’t be limited in your opinion?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-228 days agoBecause that’s what you’re implying.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-228 days agoYes you are: “We” cannot stop human beings from gaining power over others so the question is moot.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•28 days agoI see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase: “We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•28 days agoNo one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•28 days ago No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
So, amassing of power can’t be limited in your opinion?
Why are you asking me that?
Because that’s what you’re implying.
I’m neither saying nor implying that.
Yes you are:
I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase:
“We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation.
Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
Got it, you’re refusing to engage.