• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    The restaurant in question wasn’t located in the park, so that clause was just as irrelevant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      427 days ago

      Agreed but it isn’t as much a stretch as the disney+ agreement and serves the same purpose for their argument. The restaurant is on disney owned property right next to the park.