rhabarba to [email protected]English • 27 days agoOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.infomessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1123arrow-down1external-linkOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.inforhabarba to [email protected]English • 27 days agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarerhabarbaOPlinkfedilinkEnglish4•26 days agoYes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•26 days agoFor example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
minus-squarerhabarbaOPlinkfedilinkEnglish9•26 days agoOpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.