• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    48 days ago

    Ubuntu had (I don’t know if it still has) an additional contrib section in the sources.list for binary packages from “partners” without source code available, like e.g. Spotify.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 days ago

        Sorry, I mixed that up. It was named Canonical partner or something like that and contained only binary packages. Debian contrib are free packages with dependencies in non-free. While non-free are packages with not DFSG compliant source code (but with source code).

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 days ago

          That is not correct. Nonfree has software that is proprietary but jot firmware. Nonfree-firmware has the proprietary firmware.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Yes, since Bookworm, there is also non-free-firmware which before was located in non-free. I’ve skipped that for simplicity, as both follow the same rules and non-free-firmware was introduced basically for convenience.

            Do you know if either of the non-free repos contain binary files without having the source available?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                OK, TY. I’ve thought, there were just downloader packages, containing scripts to download the firmware binary from the device manufacturer and install it on the system, like e.g. the one for the Broadcom wireless driver.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 days ago

                  That would be contrib - free software that downloads or relies on non-free software. non-free and non-free-firmware just contain straight up non-free (but redistributable) binaries.