• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    -27 days ago

    So are the drivers your computer likely relies on. Are you willing to buy a thinkpad from 2005 and use a random FSF approved distro?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 days ago

      Silly whataboutism. When there are multiple Linux package management solutions to choose from that are functional, decentralized, and fully FOSS, including ones that work across distros, switching to the proprietary Canonical-controlled Snap Store is moving backward for no good reason.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        07 days ago

        I don’t see how this matters.

        Let’s look at the very worst case possible scenario: Everyone abandons Flatpak and AppImage and moves to Snapcraft, and Canonical decides to make a decision that destroys the store.

        You can still install FOSS apps from somewhere, at worst compile them.

        All that would be lost if Snapcradt stopped existing are the proprietary apps, which you wouldn’t use anyways.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          That’s not the worst possible scenario, I’d love to see the Snap Store completely replaced with decentralized FOSS alternatives. Any scenario in which the Snap Store takes market share from decentralized FOSS alternatives is considerably worse.

          Also, who said I wouldn’t use proprietary apps? I refuse to use Snap because Flatpak and other FOSS application packaging solutions that aren’t locked to a store controlled by a single for-profit company already serve my needs. I don’t have any objection to using proprietary apps that don’t have alternatives that meet my needs.