• @FizzyOrange
    link
    21
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    …for people who refuse to use static types.

    • blaue_Fledermaus
      link
      fedilink
      144 hours ago

      Static types are great, but not exactly what would have helped here, any decent language or at least a linter should catch the use of a not declared identifier.

      • @FizzyOrange
        link
        94 hours ago
        def foo(x):
          return x.whatevr
        

        No linter is going to catch that.

        • @Strykker
          link
          33 hours ago

          It’s python, just use type hinting already and your linter will catch that.

          Also some winters can look at the use of food and see the type being passed in.

          • Ephera
            link
            fedilink
            62 hours ago

            Autocorrect got you pretty bad, there.

            I was very confused, why we’re suddenly talking about rationing food during winter. 🙃

            • @Strykker
              link
              11 hour ago

              Holy crap that’s wild, new phones autocorrect is out to get me

          • @FizzyOrange
            link
            42 hours ago

            Yes you can use static type hinting and the static type checker (Mypy or Pyright) will catch that. Linters (Pylint) won’t.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -13 hours ago

          Not with an example that simple and poor, no.

          If you have done the minimum and at least set a type hint, or if your ide is smart enough to check what calls the function and what it passes, then it’ll be flagged.

          • Ephera
            link
            fedilink
            32 hours ago

            How would you make it non-awful, without specifying static types?

            I guess, a unit test would catch it, but needing 100% test coverage to catch typos isn’t exactly great…

            • @el_abuelo
              link
              125 minutes ago

              I use a spell checker in my IDE. It would catch this.

          • @FizzyOrange
            link
            12 hours ago

            What’s awful about this example? The only thing I do is access an object member. Does your code not do that??

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              What’s the purpose of foo? Why an ambiguous single character variable? What if the property was there but the value was null? Why not use (assuming JS) optional chaining?

              I’d approach it more like this:

              function getWhatevrProp(userData) (
                const default = { whatevr: "n/a" };
              
                return { ...default, ...userData }.whatevr;
              }
              

              Sorry, read too fast the first time. It’s more likely Python. I also don’t know Python well enough to give recommendations on that.