• FizzyOrange
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    LibreWolf

    Why are privacy/copyleft advocates so bad at naming?

      • FizzyOrange
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You obviously don’t need those to come up with a good name; just some taste. Signal is a great example. Ladybird and Servo are good browser names if you want to stick to that. LibreWolf? Jesus, come on guys. Forgejo is another terrible name I heard recently. Apparently it’s Esperanto, like that makes it ok somehow.

      • FizzyOrange
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You don’t have to use the exact same <element><animal> naming scheme. But even if you did it’s pretty trivial to come up with better names. I bet even ChatGPT can do it. Here’s the list it came up with for me:

        1. Thunderwolf
        2. Breezefalcon
        3. Stonehawk
        4. Blazeleopard
        5. Rainlynx
        6. Frostowl
        7. Lightningpanther
        8. Shadowraven
        9. Solarfox
        10. Cloudtiger

        Ok most are pretty trash but Stonehawk is good. Maybe Thunderwolf. Still better than LibreWolf.

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          everyone could do it

          …proceeds to not do it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          • FizzyOrange
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You don’t think Stonehawk is a better name than LibreWolf? Kind of proving my point there.

            • lad
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              No, I don’t, does that also prove your point?