• @gnus_migrate
    link
    811 months ago

    Hey, if people are going to go back to reading manuals like we’re in the 1980’s again is it such a bad thing? /s

    It’s insane how a single tool managed to completely destroy the value collectively created by people in over a decade.

    • @astral_avocado
      link
      1111 months ago

      That single tool is still propped up by that collective decade of knowledge. ChatGPT would be nothing without sites like stackoverflow

      • @gnus_migrate
        link
        -211 months ago

        Yeah but will people still care about contributing that information if they’re not going to be compensated for it in any way? Like people get something out of contributing to stack overflow, even if it’s just recognition. This is gone with ChatGPT.

          • @gnus_migrate
            link
            211 months ago

            With the FOSS model you get credited at least, so you are getting something out of it even if it’s not monetary. With ChatGPT you don’t even get that. You’re feeding an AI that’s being monetized by someone else, what possible incentive could people have to contribute anymore?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              Not everyone is motivated by money and recognition, are you aware of that? Since humans were humans, cooperation has been an integral part of society and still is today.

              Some people will always try to monetize everything, but still, people continue to develop FOSS.

              ChatGPT will be no different in that regard.

              • @gnus_migrate
                link
                111 months ago

                When a single entity reaps all of the rewards of that cooperation, people are much less motivated to do that.

                Some people are politically motivated, there are tons of reasons, but it’s a two way interaction in all of these cases.