@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago"Don't judge a book by its cover." is a bad idiom, because bookcovers are desinged to represent the content of the book.message-square39fedilinkarrow-up1241arrow-down160
arrow-up1181arrow-down1message-square"Don't judge a book by its cover." is a bad idiom, because bookcovers are desinged to represent the content of the book.@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squaredaisy lazaruslinkfedilink59•1 year agoI think the point is that the cover is never guaranteed to accurately represent the book. Quality of cover =/= quality of book
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•1 year agoAlthough, I’ll never buy a book where the author’s name is in bigger, bolder font than the title of the book. I hate that trend in cover design and I refuse to support it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•edit-21 year agoDEAN KOONTZ Newbury Award Winner New York Time Best-Seller The Lake Boat First time in paperback! With a Foreward by David Baldacci
minus-square–Phase–linkfedilink5•1 year agoIs this still a thing? I thought this was mostly popular in the 90s and dropped out of popularity in the last couple decades.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoDefinitely still see it for Stephen King at least, but frankly I’d be creeped out if I saw his name small at this point…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•1 year agoThe point of a book cover is to cover the book.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoThat’s one of the purposes of a cover, you could achieve it without any design effort. But that’s not the point, not the main purpose of a book cover. Your previous poster is right, the cover is advertising the book.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThe “cover art***” sells it, then. They were trying to be funny I think lol
minus-squarethemeatbridgelinkfedilink1•1 year agoI thought the point of the dust jacket is to make books look shabby when they get crinkled and torn, so you can take it off and find a perfectly serviceable cover underneath.
I think the point is that the cover is never guaranteed to accurately represent the book.
Quality of cover =/= quality of book
Although, I’ll never buy a book where the author’s name is in bigger, bolder font than the title of the book.
I hate that trend in cover design and I refuse to support it.
DEAN KOONTZ
Newbury Award Winner
New York Time Best-Seller
The Lake Boat
First time in paperback!
With a Foreward by David Baldacci
Is this still a thing? I thought this was mostly popular in the 90s and dropped out of popularity in the last couple decades.
Definitely still see it for Stephen King at least, but frankly I’d be creeped out if I saw his name small at this point…
Removed by mod
The point of a book cover is to cover the book.
That’s one of the purposes of a cover, you could achieve it without any design effort.
But that’s not the point, not the main purpose of a book cover. Your previous poster is right, the cover is advertising the book.
The “cover art***” sells it, then. They were trying to be funny I think lol
Removed by mod
I thought the point of the dust jacket is to make books look shabby when they get crinkled and torn, so you can take it off and find a perfectly serviceable cover underneath.