I can hear this post in their voices. Maybe I’ve seen the movie too many times…nah

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    111 months ago

    Well, if you don’t care about proving anything, and you simply believe your assumptions are facts, then why are you discussing it with me? Please continue to think whatever you wish, just as I will continue to remain unconvinced by your gut instinct on this topic

    • @lowleveldata
      link
      211 months ago

      Likewise I’m not convinced that I’m the one who needs to provide proofs in this discussion. You already said that “we” model genetic variation as being “random”. And the model is working great. Therefore it is only reasonable to assume things work according to the model unless proved otherwise. A model doesn’t need to be 100% correct to make correct predictions. We still use Newton’s physics model to predict things (flawlessly) even tho it’s not a “truly” correct model.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Um, sorry to say friend, but Newton’s laws are actually just approximations. This is the entire basis of the emergence of quantum theory.

        This perfectly illustrates the error in your thought process. You live life assuming that whatever pops into your head is the truth. Well, look where that’s led you, you actually believe physics has not improved since the 17th century.

        I’ll give you a hint: scientists do not simply write “this seems reasonable to me, therefore I feel no need to prove it” underneath their theorems. You made a claim, and you need to provide evidence if you expect to be taken seriously

        • @lowleveldata
          link
          111 months ago

          Have you read my comment? I’m aware that Newton’s model is not correct. My point was that it still predict flawlessly in most cases.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Whatever you say friend, enjoy your flawless yet incorrect predictions then, whatever that means

            • @lowleveldata
              link
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              It means it doesn’t predict correctly in quantum physics but still predicts correctly in 90% of other cases such as motions and thermodynamics in daily scales. Why do you think schools still teach those if it’s not useful?

              • @[email protected]
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                It’s taught because it’s a convenient way to teach children the scientific method, and has some practical benefit in low stakes problem solving. Those who progress beyond the basics realize there is more to physics than predicting the final destination of a billiards ball in a perfectly frictionless vacuum.

                Although if you want to believe everything you learned in high school is the Truth with a capital T then you do you. Explains a lot actually