In a closely watched case, the owner of the Dakota Access Pipeline is claiming the environmental group masterminded protests that hurt the company’s business.
Can’t they just take a play out of the corporate playbook and come back as Greeenpeace, a legally distinct entity, after transferring assets to the new entity indirectly while the old entity becomes insolvent?
Can’t they just take a play out of the corporate playbook and come back as Greeenpeace, a legally distinct entity, after transferring assets to the new entity indirectly while the old entity becomes insolvent?
🤐🤫
Greênpeace
Grünpeace.