cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWikipedia is using (some) generative AI nowwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down126cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up166arrow-down1external-linkWikipedia is using (some) generative AI nowwww.theverge.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square22linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRandomVideoslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI still fear that mistakes may slip through, but those can be spotted if multiple people check the text There are wikipedia pages that are really obscure(especially from pages that are not in english) and that nobody would probably check to verify its correct
minus-squareXanza@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago I still fear that mistakes may slip through Wikipedia is moderated by real people, so this is a non-issue. The fault tolerance for Wikipedia will be the same from AI vs People because it’s moderated by the same people regardless of where the content comes from.
I still fear that mistakes may slip through, but those can be spotted if multiple people check the text
There are wikipedia pages that are really obscure(especially from pages that are not in english) and that nobody would probably check to verify its correct
Wikipedia is moderated by real people, so this is a non-issue. The fault tolerance for Wikipedia will be the same from AI vs People because it’s moderated by the same people regardless of where the content comes from.