I made a post a few days ago asking your opinion on Manjaro and it was very mixed, with a slightly negative overall opinion. I heard some recommend EndeavourOS instead and did some online research and it seems to be pretty solid and not have the repository problem that Manjaro has.

Just for context I am a Linux noob and have only used Mint for about the past six months. While I don’t have any major complaints, I am looking to explore more distros and the Arch repository with its rolling releases. I am not a huge fan of how certain packages on apt are a few years old and outdated. However, I also don’t have the time to be always configuring my OS and just want something that works well out of the box.

Is EndeavourOS a solid choice?

  • LeFantome
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “ Can some one please clarify on configs, and maintenance in general, for EndeavourOS?”

    EndeavourOS is Arch with a nice installer and decent default configs. It is super easy to get to a nice, fully configured desktop. Once installed, it is basically Arch Linux.

    • kixik@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I was afraid so… I’m OK with Arch, and I actually use Artix (to avoid systemd), but I know there are people who don’t want, neither can do configs, nor maintain them on upgrades, as it’s a typical thing on Arch, and most distros based on it… So I’m afraid there’s really no Arch based distribution for those kind of users, and EndeavourOS seems no exception. Actually if one really wants typical Arch after installation, there are alternatives to the Arch ISO, no need for other distribution for that I’d suggest…

      It’d be nice to have an Arch based distribution equivalent to Mint, so maintenance is really minimal on new users, and users with no tech abilities. Something rolling release is actually something welcome for such users, since having to upgrade on major versions is not always as clean, even for people with some experience.

      At any rate, thanks for the clarification.