• Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -421 year ago

    If your single point is “trying to stop people only makes them do it more”, than no, it’s not a “leap”. That invalidates the very idea of having laws in the first place.

    And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

    • Orphie Baby
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We didn’t say this about everything (although it is true that some kinds of people are attracted to anything forbidden). We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

        I don’t see any such qualifiers. Do you?

        • Orphie Baby
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Semi-Hemi-Demigod said:

          It’s not that. It’s that if you tell a horny teenager that there’s pictures of naked people somewhere they’ll move heaven and earth to get to it.

          • Ech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I wasn’t responding to them, so how does that matter?

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

      Whatever you’re arguing for or against, you’re arguing like a drunk uncle. You’re taking it to an extreme that it’s obvious no one actually intended, and then arguing against that extreme like it was the original point.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        I’m not arguing against extremes, I’m arguing against a bad argument. And I’m not drunk, I only wish I were.