• LeFantome
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why? Because you liked the greater browser diversity or because you think it made a better browser?

    • boeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Diversity. MS had made great strides with EdgeHTML, but it was still pretty bad

      But at least opening the browser didn’t take all my ram.

      • Daniel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        And also at the very least you had another option. Which, in my opinion, wasn’t that bad, at least it could’ve been if they just gave up on Bing and MSN.

        • boeman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No way, they can’t give up on bing. They do that and all we have is Google for searches. We need the competition. For MSN, it’s all about content now, I kinda like that branding… It makes it easier to see that I don’t want to see it.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was actually one of the most W3C compliant browsers there is, more so than chromium based ones. Unfortunately google’s near monopoly has made websites focus on working in chrome, not on standards.