• @LeFantome
    link
    2411 months ago

    Why? Because you liked the greater browser diversity or because you think it made a better browser?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2811 months ago

      Diversity. MS had made great strides with EdgeHTML, but it was still pretty bad

      But at least opening the browser didn’t take all my ram.

      • Daniel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1011 months ago

        And also at the very least you had another option. Which, in my opinion, wasn’t that bad, at least it could’ve been if they just gave up on Bing and MSN.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          No way, they can’t give up on bing. They do that and all we have is Google for searches. We need the competition. For MSN, it’s all about content now, I kinda like that branding… It makes it easier to see that I don’t want to see it.

          • Daniel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Microsoft could host their on SearXNG instance. /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2511 months ago

      It was actually one of the most W3C compliant browsers there is, more so than chromium based ones. Unfortunately google’s near monopoly has made websites focus on working in chrome, not on standards.