• ampersandrew
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Value for money is a great thing to evaluate in a review, and the simulation of the sport has seen an increase in bugs in recent years, hence the lower scores.

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      the simulation of the sport has seen an increase in bugs in recent years,

      This is a ridiculous lie. It’s not even in the general vicinity of reality.

      The absolute best mainstream review of Madden in existence is a many times less competent version of that platformer review where the guy couldn’t get through the tutorial. You unconditionally are not qualified to give any opinion in any context if you don’t understand the mechanics and strategy of the sport.

      • ampersandrew
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fine. I don’t play Madden. But I know with the sources I follow on games news, this is what gets echoed back. Giant Bomb does a quick look for the game, say up front that they don’t expect to get through it without encountering bugs, and then they encounter bugs. The kinds of bugs you’d recognize no matter how into football you are.

        EDIT: Yup, bugs are mentioned in many reviews for the last several years of Madden. Seems to be the reality.

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There will always be bugs. It’s the nature of a complex simulation with emergent gameplay.

          But anyone telling you that they’re increasing doesn’t know what they’re talking about. They’re increasingly small edge cases as the simulation gets very obviously more advanced and complex every iteration. It’s not minor and it’s not subtle. If you play ten hours a year with a middle school football level of understanding the improvements are impossible to miss.

          Any review from someone who doesn’t watch football every week all season is the exact same quality of someone who’s never played an FPS reviewing a tactical shooter. it has literally zero value in any possible context and it’s an embarrassment to your organization to publish it.

          • ampersandrew
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I can’t speak for every reviewer, but a good number of them do watch football every week. Plenty of games have advanced simulations and don’t have texture bugs and T posing. I’m glad you enjoy the games, but the reviews are what they are for a reason. I’m also not sure how you went from, “Anyone saying these games are buggy is lying” to “Of course it will have bugs!”

            • conciselyverbose
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The reviews are what they are because there are literally zero gaming outlets who respect the existence of sports games or cover them the way they cover anything else.

              I play hundreds of games a year and have literally never once seen a player t pose on the field. It’s not a thing that’s a normal or frequent occurrence, and anyone who tells you it is isn’t just incompetent. They’re deliberately and maliciously lying to you, and in and of itself it’s incontrovertible proof that their entire review is fraud.