• thepixelfox
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    Oh sweetheart. Unless you account for a heck of a lot of people. Hundreds to thousands isn’t a very large sample size when you take into account the amount of people with disabilities there is in the world. And you also have to account for figures of people with undiagnosed disabilities too.

    So yes. Your sample size is akin to your IQ.
    Low.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        You keep saying you have a large sample size but you won’t say how large. Why should anyone believe you?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -111 months ago

              If you look back, the people addressing me have been arguing about why I shouldn’t believe my sources, and they’re using nothing but degrading insults and authoritarian arguments to try to sway me. My responses have all been appropriate. Nobody has asked for clarification or explanation. They just read my claims and reacted with their own narcissistic responses. I don’t care if you all remain ignorant of the truth.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                “I have a huge sample size but I’m not even going to say how large” is not an appropriate response.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -111 months ago

                  Allow me to rephrase for people like you. “I am confident in my research and experience, and I have no desire to explain years of work to the willfully ignorant.”

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    311 months ago

                    All kinds of people are confident despite being very wrong. Confidence is not a substitute for evidence. Neither is insulting people.