• I Cast Fist
    link
    English
    110 months ago

    It would be an issue if every place that cared about those cards crashed. Let’s use a real world example: Decentraland and Vault Hill. Both offer similar services, a “virtual reality metaverse”, not unlike VR Chat or Second Life. Both allow you to buy marketplace items in the form of NFTs, which go straight to your wallet.

    So far, so good. But, right now, neither has any plans to accept the other’s NFTs. I can prove I own something from another game, but the game itself doesn’t care. I also can’t buy Decentraland stuff with VHC tokens, nor Vault Hill items with MANA, which makes them rather centralized.

    As soon as either company crashes and goes bankrupt, everything connected will become useless and lose most or all value. Thus, blockchain wouldn’t fix the issue.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      neither has any plans to accept the other’s NFTs.

      However, NFTs that are accepted by both will have higher value.

      but the game itself doesn’t care.

      We are starting seeing this on Roblox and Fortnite where skins can pass through to different games. .

      As soon as either company crashes and goes bankrupt, everything connected will become useless and lose most or all value. Thus, blockchain wouldn’t fix the issue.

      That’s exactly what blockchain is fixing. E.g. Your valuable skins don’t disappear when the company running the game you play goes bankrupt.

      That’s the theory. Games companies are at the private blockchain stage but there are some small web3 game developers.