• @[email protected]
    -6•11 months ago

    For the user or the company? Assuming the user isn’t a moron with computers?

    Edit: guess im out of the loop as a contractor who generally only does BYOD with my linux machine

    • @[email protected]English
      15•11 months ago

      Both. The company puts shit on the user’s computer and the user may not meet the company’s security standards. It’s just a bad idea.

    • @[email protected]
      14•11 months ago

      For the company, and no one should ever assume for a moment that everyone has their guard up at all times and is infallible.

      • Metype
        2•11 months ago

        As far as I’ve heard you actually assume quite the opposite.

    • @[email protected]
      2•11 months ago

      If a user doesn’t understand that having complete control over every device in your network is essential, he’s being a complete moron with computers.

      You should do your work, not worrying about patching all the 128 tools you think you need, that’s other peoples job.