Agent_Karyo@piefed.worldM to Horror Games@piefed.worldEnglish · 3 天前There's more to Horses than the Steam ban: The controversial horror game is a great example of how games can effectively borrow from film, and how they can also stumblewww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down11
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkThere's more to Horses than the Steam ban: The controversial horror game is a great example of how games can effectively borrow from film, and how they can also stumblewww.pcgamer.comAgent_Karyo@piefed.worldM to Horror Games@piefed.worldEnglish · 3 天前message-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareFeydlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 天前You’re actually just wrong. The naked person in that scene was the horse/human. Never the not being treated as a horse person.
minus-squareplantfanatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 天前According to the dev…? Did he provide proof? Nope. Just deflects blame to valve instead. What a dev…. You can’t say the boogeyman doesn’t exist, then use the same for your defence. There was material that broke rules. They changed it to be acceptable. Literally the one thing you can’t do is child sexual material. Read between the fucking lines lmfao.
minus-squareFeydlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 天前Yeah took the wind out of your sails finding out your outrage was based on poor reading comprehension didn’t it. No apology for me?
minus-squareplantfanatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 天前Why would I apologize to a pedo defender who lacks basic reading comprehension skills lmfao. How deluded are you? Do you even know what the term means? I just blew your defense apart by using your own, and you say I deflated my sails? Fucking lmfao. If my defense fails, so does yours, because it’s the same as yours you mook.
You’re actually just wrong. The naked person in that scene was the horse/human. Never the not being treated as a horse person.
According to the dev…? Did he provide proof? Nope. Just deflects blame to valve instead. What a dev….
You can’t say the boogeyman doesn’t exist, then use the same for your defence. There was material that broke rules. They changed it to be acceptable.
Literally the one thing you can’t do is child sexual material. Read between the fucking lines lmfao.
Yeah took the wind out of your sails finding out your outrage was based on poor reading comprehension didn’t it. No apology for me?
Why would I apologize to a pedo defender who lacks basic reading comprehension skills lmfao. How deluded are you?
Do you even know what the term means? I just blew your defense apart by using your own, and you say I deflated my sails? Fucking lmfao.
If my defense fails, so does yours, because it’s the same as yours you mook.