The rest of the chapter also acts like (a+b)y is acceptable notation for factorization, which is why it appears in - for example - those two sentences concisely demonstrating you’re full of shit.
Just like all the books that say a*b and a(b) and ab are the same thing.
You don’t get to sneer at people for not reading all of every math textbook ever and then act fucking illiterate when people point to a comment that explicitly says “read this thing from this page, it says you’re full of shit.”
OMG. That’s not even the same link BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! We were talking about this link…
You don’t get to sneer at people for not reading all of every math textbook ever
I only told you to read more than 2 sentences from one book, and specifically that chapter, not the whole book. You’re digging deep into your strawmans now, just like someone who is wrong does 🤣🤣🤣
read this thing from this page,
Except, again, you never said what page, duuuhhh!!!
Chapters. You’re ignoring the whole rest of the chapter 🙄
says someone failing to give a single example of any
Nope. The problem is you not reading the whole chapter 🙄
The rest of the chapter also acts like (a+b)y is acceptable notation for factorization, which is why it appears in - for example - those two sentences concisely demonstrating you’re full of shit.
Just like all the books that say a*b and a(b) and ab are the same thing.
Which it isn’t in modern textbooks. You know this is a 1965 textbook, right? No, you probably don’t, given you only quoted 2 sentences
Nope. The whole rest of the chapter proves you are full of shit, hence why you’ve refused to read any more 🙄
It doesn’t. Once you read some more you’ll find that axb is explicitly excluded from the list of Product notations
The textbook in question has URLs on every page. How modern is modern enough, to admit you’re full of shit?
says person who still can’t link to, or say which page, this supposed proof is on 🙄
says person who still hasn’t managed to link to a specific page 🙄
Follow link, Ctrl+F “page”, learn reading comprehension.
You don’t get to sneer at people for not reading all of every math textbook ever and then act fucking illiterate when people point to a comment that explicitly says “read this thing from this page, it says you’re full of shit.”
OMG. That’s not even the same link BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! We were talking about this link…
I only told you to read more than 2 sentences from one book, and specifically that chapter, not the whole book. You’re digging deep into your strawmans now, just like someone who is wrong does 🤣🤣🤣
Except, again, you never said what page, duuuhhh!!!
Follow link, Ctrl+F “page”, for where I plainly said which page, and learn reading comprehension.
says person still posting the wrong link 🤣