Mog Spawn@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · há 3 mesesMath is not a democracylemmy.worldimagemessage-square358linkfedilinkarrow-up1717arrow-down128
arrow-up1689arrow-down1imageMath is not a democracylemmy.worldMog Spawn@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · há 3 mesesmessage-square358linkfedilink
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·há 2 meses Yes, this textbook says a(bc)2 works differently from how you say it works No it doesn’t 🤣🤣🤣 I have said the whole time that a(bc)²=ab²c², which is exactly what this textbook does 🙄 a(b+c) is different to a(bc)², duuuhhh 🙄 You don’t have an answer for that because you’re a fraud says person who can’t quote any part saying it works differently to how I said, and in fact quoted a part showing it works exactly how I said 🤣🤣🤣 If you want textbooks that also disprove how you pretend a(b+c)n works been telling you the whole time it’s irrelevent to a(b+c) which has no exponent Mr. False Equivalence 🙄
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·há 2 mesesYou explicitly believe 2(8)2 is 22*82.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·há 1 mês You explicitly believe 2(8)2 is 22*82. No I don’t liar. Go ahead and produce a screenshot of me saying that. I’ll wait
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·há 1 mêsDo you think 2(8+0)2 is different from 2(8*1)2? You’re going to say yes, and I won’t have to screenshot shit. You unambiguously think reducing inside parentheses works different sometimes, because you don’t understand math for children. Or that 13-year-olds are in fact children.
No it doesn’t 🤣🤣🤣 I have said the whole time that a(bc)²=ab²c², which is exactly what this textbook does 🙄 a(b+c) is different to a(bc)², duuuhhh 🙄
says person who can’t quote any part saying it works differently to how I said, and in fact quoted a part showing it works exactly how I said 🤣🤣🤣
been telling you the whole time it’s irrelevent to a(b+c) which has no exponent Mr. False Equivalence 🙄
You explicitly believe 2(8)2 is 22*82.
No I don’t liar. Go ahead and produce a screenshot of me saying that. I’ll wait
Do you think 2(8+0)2 is different from 2(8*1)2?
You’re going to say yes, and I won’t have to screenshot shit. You unambiguously think reducing inside parentheses works different sometimes, because you don’t understand math for children. Or that 13-year-olds are in fact children.