@[email protected] to > [email protected] • 11 months agoAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down145
arrow-up11.44Karrow-down1imageAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.works@[email protected] to > [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square144fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•10 months agoWhy is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
minus-squarekamenlinkfedilinkEnglish4•10 months ago“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoSamsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
One of the very few phones like this.
deleted by creator