@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.eeimagemessage-square1745fedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down1319
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.ee@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square1745fedilink
minus-square@Noughmadlink1•1 year agoRead the comment that I replied to. It does not say “have”, but “do”.
minus-squareEgon [they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoYeah and then you wrote “in either case, I agree” as in you think it would be better to have Scandinavians, than whatever you have now, which is why I ask what you mean by that?
minus-square@Noughmadlink2•1 year agoThe two cases were “do (meaning ‘emulate’) their economy and policies” and “do (meaning ‘have sex with’) their people”. No “have” anywhere.
minus-squareEgon [they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoOkay that does make more sense, I had trouble parsing the text, thank you for taking the time to explain it.
Read the comment that I replied to. It does not say “have”, but “do”.
Yeah and then you wrote “in either case, I agree” as in you think it would be better to have Scandinavians, than whatever you have now, which is why I ask what you mean by that?
The two cases were “do (meaning ‘emulate’) their economy and policies” and “do (meaning ‘have sex with’) their people”. No “have” anywhere.
Okay that does make more sense, I had trouble parsing the text, thank you for taking the time to explain it.