My first language was Racket and so naturally I gravitated to the lispy untyped functional programming style even when I was using languages like Python or Java, but when I tried Haskell for the first time my mind was absolutely blown and I was a convert ever since. What are your thoughts?

  • acow
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also started my FP journey with untyped languages. Finding Haskell changed my perspective because it answered questions I hadn’t yet been able to clearly articulate to myself.

    That said, I do sympathize with the criticism that static types can make some things harder to use. I think it’s because we’re not yet doing everything right, but the reality is that some, say, Python APIs are faster to get going with than comparable things in Haskell.

    • First
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On a side note, the book “Functional Programming in C#” has good sideline explanations for what one is missing out on by using a type system that was designed for OO instead of FP.