• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    210 months ago

    The obvious choice would’ve been to not use it and state the numbers plainly.

    How would you write it?

    • Illecors
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -910 months ago

      The open source Git project just released Git 2.42 with features and bug fixes from 78 contributors, 17 of them new.

      There. Simple.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        But there were more contributors, you just don’t know how many. By this you’re kind of disregarding their work.

        • Illecors
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1010 months ago

          No there aren’t, stop making things up. From the official release notes:

          The latest feature release Git v2.42.0 is now available at the
          usual places.  It is comprised of 453 non-merge commits since
          v2.41.0, contributed by 78 people, 17 of which are new faces
          
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            78 people contributed in the form of code commits, but more people likely contributed to the release in other ways (QA, triage, release management etc.)

            • Illecors
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1110 months ago

              Fuck me. Can you not read? It is stating specifically features and bug fixes. QA, triage, release management are neither features nor bug fixes. They’re processes. They’re necessary. But that’s a separate thing.